Can a man scoop a flame into his lap and not have his clothes catch on fire? Proverbs 6:27
Reference links:Old Testament
Apparently, God really hates the Amalekites for attacking Israel. God tells Moses that he will
erase the memory of Amalek from under heaven.and Moses, after talking with God said,
They have raised their fist against the Lord's throne, so now the Lord will be at war with Amalek generation after generation.That seems harsh. How were the Amalekites to know they were attacking God's chosen people? Rumor of God's cruelty in Egypt probably had not yet reached them. From the Amalekites point of view, a mass of a million people was invading their land. No wonder they felt threatened.
Jethro visits to return Moses' wife and sons (apparently, Moses had sent them to Jethro at some point). He gives Moses some advice. Moses had been judging all of the disputes of the 600,000 Israelites by himself (I assume the women did not come to Moses with their problems). Jethro points out that such a solution is unscalable, and advises Moses to assign people to take care of the day to day disputes. There would be separate leaders for groups of 10, 50, 100, and 1000 with Moses at the top.
I wonder if the Biblical author forgot there were (modulo the war with the Amalekites) 600,000 men. The gap between 1000 and 600,000 seems rather large.
Today we read about how the Isrealites left Rephidim and arrived at the wilderness of Sinai, setting up camp at the base of Mount Sinai. This is slightly confusing since yesterday that we read
At the Lord's command, the whole community of Israel left the wilderness of Sin and moved from place to place. Eventually they camped at Rephidim, but there was no water there for the people to drink.If we grant that the wilderness of Sin and the wilderness of Sinai are different places, the two accounts are consistent in their ordering (Rephidim then Mount Sinai). So are we going through a non-linear narrative (the battle with the Amalekites happened before the water from the rock even though it is placed later in the narrative) or did the Israelites go back to Mount Sinai?
God decides that he will talk to the people from a cloud, but first they have to spend three days consecrating themselves. Not an unreasonable request on God's part.
New Testament
The Pharisees ask Jesus which is the most important of Moses' commandments (don't worry, we'll get there soon). Jesus says the most important ones are
- Loving God
- Loving your neighbor as yourself
Additionally, he claims that the rest of the law is based on these two commandments. Not a bad of base assumptions, although I would throw out one of them (guess which one!).
Jesus criticizes the religious teacher some more. I think Jesus would have made a good Fox News commentator.
Psalms and Proverbs
Today's psalm is another that I read as the author willing himself to believe God is there.
Hear me as I pray, O Lord.Most people, as near as I can know, occasionally experience the sense that there exists something greater than one's self. However, it seems unnecessary to anthropomorphize that feeling and assume that it is a distinct consciousness.
Be merciful and answer me!
My heart has heard you say, "Come and talk with me."
And my heart responds, "Lord, I am coming."
Do not turn your back on me.
Do not reject your servant in anger.
You have always been my helper.
Don't leave me now; don't abandon me,
O God of my salvation!
Proverbs continues to tell us adultery is bad.
Today's New Testament passage is eerily similar to a famous story about Hillel, the great Jewish scholar who lived around the same time as Jesus. He was approached by a gentile and given the following challenge: if he (Hillel) could teach him (the gentile) the entire Torah while he (not sure which) was standing on one leg, then he (the gentile) would convert. Hillel agreed to the task, and said, "Do unto others as you want to have done to yourself. All the rest is commentary; now go and learn."
ReplyDeleteNow that I think about this further, most of the Torah is not commentary on this (many commandments appear unrelated to the Golden Rule, not to mention all the stories and geneologies). So, the Jesus version seems slightly more credible by not claiming that the rest of the Bible is somehow about the Golden Rule. but they're still remarkably similar stories.
So, now I wonder: did the writers of the New Testament copy this story from the Jews and re-attribute it to Jesus? Did Jews copy it from Jesus and retroactively attribute it to Hillel instead? Did both of them come up with it independently? Did both of them borrow it from some third tradition? I have no idea, but I'll wager there's a connection.
Fascinating connection!
ReplyDelete